Repo Compare › Embedded RTOS

Zephyr vs FreeRTOS vs RIOT

A side-by-side look at how actively Zephyr, FreeRTOS and RIOT are developed on GitHub — popularity, contributor base, commit activity and how quickly issues and pull requests move.

What the numbers say

Head-to-head

Snapshot taken 30 September 2026.

MetricZephyr
Slowing
FreeRTOS
Slowing
RIOT
Active
Stars17k4.5k5.8k
Forks10k1.6k2.1k
Contributors4.7k245557
Commits, last 52 weeks29k692.0k
Open issues2.0k43414
Open pull requests1.9k54490
Closed / merged PRs86k1.1k19k
Watchers414113245
Last push30 Sep 202626 Aug 202630 Sep 2026
Latest releasev4.4.2 (Aug 2026)V11.3.1 (Aug 2026)2026.07 (Aug 2026)
Main languageCCC
LicenceApache-2.0MITLGPL-2.1
CreatedMay 2016Sep 2019Dec 2012

The wide bar is that repository’s share of the largest value in its own row — half the length means half the number. The thin gauge beneath it is the same row rescaled from its smallest value to its largest, which makes a close gap such as 61k against 59k visible; on that gauge the row’s lowest value always sits at zero however big it is, so read it as a spread and never as a quantity. Bars compare repositories with each other and never one metric against another. Colour identifies the repository, matching the dot beside its name. On the two issue rows a longer bar means more open work, which is usually the opposite of better. The highlighted cell is the highest value in a row. “Active / Slowing / Dormant” is a simple heuristic from how recently code was pushed and open issues per star — a starting point, not a verdict. Stars measure popularity, not quality.

Open these in the live comparer →

Related comparisons