Repo Compare › Infrastructure as code

Terraform vs OpenTofu vs Pulumi

A side-by-side look at how actively Terraform, OpenTofu and Pulumi are developed on GitHub — popularity, contributor base, commit activity and how quickly issues and pull requests move.

What the numbers say

Head-to-head

Snapshot taken 30 September 2026.

MetricTerraform
Active
OpenTofu
Active
Pulumi
Slowing
Stars50k30k26k
Forks11k1.4k1.4k
Contributors2.3k2.4k403
Commits, last 52 weeks1.2k8422.4k
Open issues1.8k2752.2k
Open pull requests16750279
Closed / merged PRs17k2.6k13k
Watchers1.2k148191
Last push30 Sep 202629 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Latest releasev1.16.4 (Sep 2026)v1.12.6 (Aug 2026)v3.266.0 (Sep 2026)
Main languageGoGoGo
LicenceNot detected by GitHubMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
CreatedMar 2014Aug 2023Oct 2016

The wide bar is that repository’s share of the largest value in its own row — half the length means half the number. The thin gauge beneath it is the same row rescaled from its smallest value to its largest, which makes a close gap such as 61k against 59k visible; on that gauge the row’s lowest value always sits at zero however big it is, so read it as a spread and never as a quantity. Bars compare repositories with each other and never one metric against another. Colour identifies the repository, matching the dot beside its name. On the two issue rows a longer bar means more open work, which is usually the opposite of better. The highlighted cell is the highest value in a row. “Active / Slowing / Dormant” is a simple heuristic from how recently code was pushed and open issues per star — a starting point, not a verdict. Stars measure popularity, not quality.

Open these in the live comparer →

Related comparisons