Repo Compare › CSS frameworks

Tailwind CSS vs Bootstrap vs Bulma

A side-by-side look at how actively Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap and Bulma are developed on GitHub — popularity, contributor base, commit activity and how quickly issues and pull requests move.

What the numbers say

Head-to-head

Snapshot taken 30 September 2026.

MetricTailwind CSS
Active
Bootstrap
Active
Bulma
Active
Stars98k175k50k
Forks7.2k79k3.9k
Contributors3761.7k430
Commits, last 52 weeks4121766
Open issues36103348
Open pull requests52122179
Closed / merged PRs4.4k16k1.0k
Watchers7506.6k574
Last push25 Sep 202629 Sep 202621 Sep 2026
Latest releasev4.3.3 (Jul 2026)v5.3.8 (Aug 2025)1.0.4 (Apr 2025)
Main languageTypeScriptMDXCSS
LicenceMITMITMIT
CreatedOct 2017Jul 2011Jan 2016

The wide bar is that repository’s share of the largest value in its own row — half the length means half the number. The thin gauge beneath it is the same row rescaled from its smallest value to its largest, which makes a close gap such as 61k against 59k visible; on that gauge the row’s lowest value always sits at zero however big it is, so read it as a spread and never as a quantity. Bars compare repositories with each other and never one metric against another. Colour identifies the repository, matching the dot beside its name. On the two issue rows a longer bar means more open work, which is usually the opposite of better. The highlighted cell is the highest value in a row. “Active / Slowing / Dormant” is a simple heuristic from how recently code was pushed and open issues per star — a starting point, not a verdict. Stars measure popularity, not quality.

Open these in the live comparer →

Related comparisons