Repo Compare › Frontend frameworks

SolidJS vs Preact vs Qwik

A side-by-side look at how actively SolidJS, Preact and Qwik are developed on GitHub — popularity, contributor base, commit activity and how quickly issues and pull requests move.

What the numbers say

Head-to-head

Snapshot taken 30 September 2026.

MetricSolidJS
Active
Preact
Active
Qwik
Active
Stars36k39k22k
Forks1.1k3.4k1.4k
Contributors195381673
Commits, last 52 weeks853394.0k
Open issues292249
Open pull requests202748
Closed / merged PRs9822.9k6.1k
Watchers214393130
Last push30 Sep 202630 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Latest releasev1.9.0 (Sep 2024)10.29.8 (Aug 2026)@builder.io/[email protected] (Sep 2026)
Main languageTypeScriptJavaScriptTypeScript
LicenceMITMITMIT
CreatedApr 2018Sep 2015May 2021

The wide bar is that repository’s share of the largest value in its own row — half the length means half the number. The thin gauge beneath it is the same row rescaled from its smallest value to its largest, which makes a close gap such as 61k against 59k visible; on that gauge the row’s lowest value always sits at zero however big it is, so read it as a spread and never as a quantity. Bars compare repositories with each other and never one metric against another. Colour identifies the repository, matching the dot beside its name. On the two issue rows a longer bar means more open work, which is usually the opposite of better. The highlighted cell is the highest value in a row. “Active / Slowing / Dormant” is a simple heuristic from how recently code was pushed and open issues per star — a starting point, not a verdict. Stars measure popularity, not quality.

Open these in the live comparer →

Related comparisons